Thank you for all your very hard work Mr Chilcott - it has been much appreciated.
Ms W. Clarkson-Leach
Blog
Birth Trauma Litigation Seminar, Amsterdam, 14 and 15 October 2011
Mon 17th Oct 2011 Clinical negligence
I am fortunate enough to be a member of PEOPIL (Pan-European Organisation of Personal Injury Lawyers), a group set up to share and exchange knowledge about all aspect of personal injury law (as the name suggests) across Europe.
The organisation also provides an excellent network of highly qualified and
experienced lawyers, whom we can turn to should someone have been unfortunate
enough to suffer injury in another country through no fault of their own. As
our Travel Team at Blake Lapthorn knows only too well, such contacts are
invaluable to ensure that those individuals are able to secure the
rehabilitation and compensation they need and deserve, to enable them to return
to their former lifestyle as fully and as quickly as possible.
I was even more fortunate last
week to be able to attend the first conference arranged between PEOPIL and AAJ (The American Association for Justice). The Conference was entitled Birth
Trauma Litigation Seminar and was held at The Grand Hotel in Amsterdam (I digress, but the hotel certainly
lives up to its name – breakfast and beds to die for!).
The Seminar focused upon the most
current thinking in medical terms about the most likely causes of injuries
sustained at or shortly after birth, whether some of these causes are
preventable and the warning signs that treating clinicians need to be alert to
and the steps that need to be taken to avoid often life-changing injury or
worse. We were also able to learn about the way that differing countries in the
EU or in the States deal with these issues from a legal perspective, and their
approach as to when compensation should be available and how the level of
compensation should be calculated.
Sadly due to flight availability,
I was only able to stay at the Conference until the Friday evening. I have been
working with clients who have suffered
injury, following or as a result of some
form of medical treatment/failure to give the correct medical treatment, since
I qualified as a solicitor at Blake Lapthorn 7 years ago, but I can honestly
say that I learnt something new from each and every one of the speakers on
Friday. Whether it be in terms of new medical knowledge and diagnostic tools;
new ways of presenting an individual’s life expectancy to ensure that they
receive sufficient compensation to last them for their full lifespan, taking
into account new medical advances and the care that can and should be made
available to them; or the way in which different countries or states deal with
the recoverability of damages in these claims, all of the lectures increased my
own personal knowledge to enable me to act in all of my clients very best
interests.
I am only sorry that I was not
able to stay on to hear the lectures delivered on Saturday, as looking through
the programme, I am sure that this was bound to be repeated.
Whilst I cannot speak highly
enough of all of the speakers on Friday, special mention has to be given to Janet Rennie, Consultant neonatologist at UCL, who gave a fascinating seminar
on the difficulties encountered and tools available to determine whether or not
an injury can be linked to the treatment received at the time of the child’s
birth; and Malcolm Levene, neonatologist at Leeds, who gave a brilliant and
highly informative seminar on the causes of stroke in babies. Both talks were
highly relevant to current cases that I am investigating and I may well be in
touch shortly…
Frances Cowan, Expert in
paediatric neurology (Imperial College London) also gave me an enlightening
insight into the interpretation of MRI scans, which, as a lawyer, rather than a
medic, have remained something of a mystery to me!
The Dutch Legal system seems to
have an excellent approach in the way that they look to award damages to
individuals to try best to “put them in the position that they would have been
in, had the proven negligence not occurred” and our courts could look to
Carolien van Weering (and the Dutch courts) for a clear explanation as to how
this should work in wrongful birth cases. Our colleagues in the USA also
provided insight into very well-reasoned arguments as to why the way in which
the courts and Government actuary tables in the UK calculate future care needs,
may result in damages awards that fall woefully short for the individuals’
needs.
Additionally, from a personal and
professional point of view, I had the pleasure of meeting colleagues practising
in the UK who strive to achieve the same goals for our clients that I do.
My primary feeling on leaving the
conference, although rather earlier than I would have wished, was that as both
medical practitioners and clinical negligence lawyers acting for children and
adults who have suffered injury as a consequence of circumstances surrounding
their birth or in the earliest months of their lives, we all share the same
passion for helping those individuals to ensure that they have the best access
to rehabilitation and care so that they can live their lives with the greatest
degree of fulfilment possible.
I sincerely hope that another
conference arranged between PEOPIL and AAJ will not be far away, and that this
time I shall be lucky enough to attend the full event!
Kym Provan
Senior Solicitor - Clinical Negligence Team
Would you like us to call you back?
Call us between 8am and 6pm Monday to Friday, or use the enquiry form outside office hours
Or call us on 0844 620 6600












