My dismay at GP 'e-consultations' recommendations
Who are BL Claims Solicitors
BL Claims Solicitors specialise in personal injury, clinical negligence and travel claims, providing our clients with hands-on support, nationally.
We are rated as one of the top firms in the UK and believe in speaking to our clients in jargon-free language and ensuring you're speaking to a highly qualified lawyer right from the outset
An unwell patient is not capable of, or qualified to, make a correct diagnosis. This is why we seek the advice of our GPs if we are unwell or feel that something is wrong. How though, can a GP, without examining or speaking to us, be expected to make an accurate diagnosis, on the basis of our unqualified description of our symptoms, committed to eternity to the internet? How many of us would tell a GP that we have problems with our toilet habits, or require a repeat prescription for our antidepressants and by the way, think that we may have found a lump in our breast in an e-mail?
Clearly there is a place for telephone consultations, and I myself have benefited from these (travel medication) when it is really not necessary for me to take up my GP's consultation time. I would not however want to do anything more than re-order a non-problematic prescription (such as an asthma inhaler) on this basis.
The vast majority of people do not seek an appointment with their GP unless there is something that they need to discuss with a medically qualified individual. When a patient has symptoms of meningitis, colon cancer or breast cancer, a GP who gets to see that patient face to face, is expected, and in most circumstances will, recognise the symptoms and refer that patient appropriately. This cannot be the case when a GP only has the benefit of a telephone call, or even worse, an e-mail correspondence with the patient.
GPs already have a minimal amount of time in which to assess patients. Telephone appointments have their place but are not a substitute for a personal consultation when the patient considers this necessary. The proposal that GPs should offer e-mail consultations is fraught with problems.
It is of note that Mr Jeremy Hunt, Secretary of State for Health, has no medical qualifications and no experience of dealing with ill patients.
GPs are highly qualified and have trained for years to try and indentify health problems in their patients at the earliest opportunity, and to refer them to the appropriate specialist if necessary. To expect them to discharge the duty of care that they rightly owe to their patients by e-mail, is surely to leave them open to increased allegations of negligence, and the costs that flow from such allegations?
No-one is infallible and I and my colleagues have a number of clinical negligence cases against GP's who have failed to discharge their duty of care. However, over 99.9% of GPs go into practice with the best of intentions and wanting to serve their patients to the best of their ability. I fail to see how they can demonstrate that ability through an e-mail or on-line consultation with a patient.
Head of South Coast Clinical Negligence team
BL Claims Solicitors are here to help
If you would like to talk to someone and discuss a potential claim please call us on 0344 620 6600 anytime between 8am and 6pm Monday to Friday, or if you would prefer you can email us at email@example.com